Response to Planet Forward Question

Response to Planet Forward Question:
On December 1st, 2010 at 12:31 pm Susanna, PF Web Maven Said: "This sounds interesting, but a little over my head. How would this idea change the way we think about or use energy?"
Planet Forward is a project of the Center for Innovative Media at the George Washington University - the post is from a Fuel 2000 and Beyond team member:

It is interesting to note the Cold Fusion Now post reflecting the history of energy evolution, contrasting the current "unnatural stagnant energy trend" that has continued for decades.
http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2010/12/10/1976-edison-electric-institue-pamphlet
Entitled The Transitional Storm -Or The Changing Energy Epoch, the four-page pamphlet has a brief history of human energy use, describing how each energy epoch has transitioned from one type of fuel to another somewhat smoothly, meaning that historically, humanity has been able to discover new forms of power generation and fuel before the previous technologies fuel ran out
In other words, we found coal before all the trees were burned. We found oil before all the coal was burned. However, they go on to say, “Today it is different.” The fossil-fuel epoch and the next age are not completely interlocking. There is also is a large supply-demand gap, and we call this gap a “transitional storm”-you’ve heard it called an “Energy Crisis.”

Response to question on Planet Forward

As scientist Brian O’Leary says, ‘the first step is to let go of our fears and become aware of the magnificent things that are possible”.

There exist hundreds of proofs of concepts of new energy devices, ranging from energy from the vacuum (zero point), cold fusion, and special hydrogen and water technologies, all which connect to an easily understood mathematical framework using the Quantity C as the Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law.

Understanding the Radius of Curvature concept permits anyone to know without a doubt that the following applications have long since been possible with our advances in science and technology:

• Field dependent propulsion
• Fields & Application of Anti-gravity - polarization of gravity
• Special hydrogen and water technologies, field related – instant cheap hydrogen for fuel cells
• FTL -faster than light transportation
• "Movement"/"Transference" - from one point to another without going through all points in between
• Transmutation of elements (Periodic Table application from one element to the next))

Even contemporary physicists have proposed that there might be some coupling between electricity and gravity repulsion at very high energies(or as Hawking said, a possible antigravitational effect from a supercooling phenomena) and are now using the Hadron Collider in an attempt to discover that which the energy differential of the quantity C radius already reveals:

• The QC is both the energy differential of velocity of light, and the total energy content of any quantity of matter converted to energy
• In other words, if we take a gram (or any other quantity of matter: Newtonian mass) and convert that matter gradually into energy according to the formula E = MC2, and the resultant energy, as it appeared, were constantly applied to the remaining matter in such a way as to accelerate it uniformly in a given direction, when all the matter had been so converted we would find that we had zero Newtonian mass, infinite inertial mass and a resultant velocity equal to the quantity C, or approximately 3x10(10) centimeters per second (with respect to the given reference or starting point). The maximum velocity attained would always be the same regardless of the quantity of matter with which we started.

The radius of curvature of all natural law quantified the radius to the energy differential of the speed of light, shedding insight to many of the mis-interpretations of the Theory of Relativity, i.e. as in:

• nothing goes faster than the speed of light
• when an object travels faster and faster, its mass increases
• time slows, stops, goes backwards – correspondingly when approaching, at, exceeding VC
• As an object approaches the speed of light its mass becomes infinite

The obvious subsequent realization of such narrow, mis-interpreted errors swiftly correct to - the 'increasing mass' of the target is only the measure of the kinetic energy differential which exists between them http://fuel2000.net/

StarSteps excerpt: While we have repeatedly referred to the quantity C as an energy differential, we have heretofore considered it only in terms of kinetic energy. Some may believe that it can be reached only when there is a rate of increase or decrease in the degree of spatial separation between the reference points, equal to 3x10(10) centimeters per second, or in simpler terms, a velocity equal to that of light. It is necessary therefore to point out the fact that an energy differential does not necessarily manifest itself as a velocity. It can also exist as a frequency. Our present laws of physics state that the energy level upon which an electron, a photon, or other particle exists is proportionate to its frequency. The mathematical rule is E equals Fh, where E is the energy, F is the frequency and h is a factor called Planck's constant.
We can now see that a frequency differential which by the above formula is equal to 9x10(20) ergs per gram also represents the quantity C. When such a frequency differential exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, we again find that the natural laws at the observed point reach zero value with respect to the observer. If the frequency differential exceeds this value, the action of the laws will become negative. A material object such as a spacecraft upon or near the surface of the earth would cease to exist as matter and would enter the plane of energy insofar as the observer on earth was concerned, but as we have previously pointed out, an observer upon or within the object, whose frequency or energy level had been raised to the same degree as that of the craft, would be unable to detect any change.

Reference links:
• StarSteps Part one http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps1.pdf
• StarSteps Part Two http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps2.pdf
• StarSteps Part Three http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps3.pdf
• http://www.fuel2000.net/
• http://freedomtimes.blogspot.com/
• http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com/
• http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com/2010/01/its-musical-universe.html

Aside from the cold fusion, zero point, sympathetic vibratory physics and StarSteps pdf links provided in the original post, those interested in further exploration where the QC radius of curvature sheds credible insight:

• Dr Brian O’Leary - The Sustainable Technology Solution Revolution: http://www.brianoleary.info/
• The New Energy Movement http://www.newenergymovement.org/
• Cal Physics Institute - Zero Point Energy http://www.calphysics.org/index.htm l
• Cold Fusion http://coldfusionnow.org/
• Dr Paul LaViolette (subquantum kinetics) http://etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/Book-Secrets.html
• Shedding light on Walter Russell http://www.svpvril.com/musicuni.html
• Dr Thomas Valone http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/electrogravitics.html
• Heim’s Quantum Theory http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1680
• Vortex based mathematics (supporting sympathetic vibratory physics and Walter Russell) http://pesn.com/2010/10/23/9501714_Vortex_Based_Mathematics_at
_TEDx_Charolette_by_Randy_Powell
Those who read StarSteps (explained in layman’s terms) will find the impossible is indeed theoretically & technologically very possible.

The only question remains, what is hampering Universities’ R&D besides corporate funding directions?